FW: AAC in the Desert 2006

I received this interesting bit of email yesterday. I have no illusions that I received this invitation because of anything resembling personal recommendations. Someone simply did a web search on AAC-related keywords and my name came up. If this was 2004, I’d be marshalling my remaining financing resources to either attend personally or send my Chinese volunteers. Of course, I no longer have those resources. Besides, even I were to flog the few financial supporters I still have, I couldn’t guarantee them that the trip would pay off. That’s just the murky nature of the AAC field.

 

Yet, the brochure referred to in the email has its interesting points. Therapy One is apparently a startup in Phoenix that desires to serve the whole Southwest. Good luck there. What’s interesting in their workshop brochure is the blurb on Ms Fonner’s presentation. Its wording and tone suggest that developing AAC that is really accepted by disabled clients and used is quite frustrating. The presentation description also indicates that she advocates solutions that integrate well into the actual routines and life-styles of the clients. Seems to me that she’s chanting the same mantra I’ve chanted for years. Anyone who’s a regular reader of my blog knows that is the history of my AAC, Xpress It. Any software developer will attest that no program, no matter how well designed and written, can be the best in every category. That’s why I wrote Xpress It, because my managers at Shell Oil found no existing AAC products good enough to let me talk to any of our internal customers while using the same computer for other business tasks. Single-function devices are simply not cost-effective. Xpress It is intentionally focused solely on AAC functions, allowing Windows or other third-party answers to better address any other special needs. This is the sort of best-of-breed approach that will be required to create solutions flexible enough to enable people with disabilities to be a productive segment of society. Sadly though, the speech pathologists I’ve talked to perceive precious little interest within the Disabled community. Something tells me that this could be the subject of a long and complicated discussion of disability and society.

 

Since I know Phoenix is out of the question, I’m sending copies of this blog entry to Kelly Fonner and Therapy One. Perhaps they will see something here that piques their interest. The rest of my blog is available here. Between the recent entries and archives, there is a lot of information on both me and Xpress It. Of course the official Xpress It web page has further info as well as a link to download and try Xpress It for free. While still a work in progress, Xpress It has served me well for nine years. If Ms Fonner or Therapy One see something with potential, they know how to reach me.

 

 


From: therapyoneaz@yahoo.com [mailto:therapyoneaz@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 1:41 PM
To: royall@conchbbs.com
Subject: AAC in the Desert 2006

 

AAC in the Desert 2006
March 31-April 1, 2006

Come and enjoy sunny Phoenix, Arizona and get professional CEUs at this two-day workshop.  Dr. Caroline Ramsey Musselwhite and Kelly Fonner will present valuable ideas and strategies for using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in homes, clinics, and schools.  This workshop is for parents, school teams, therapists, and others working with children who use light-tech and high-tech AAC.  There will be a lot of door prizes and freebies!  Registration includes lunch both days. Seats are limited! Call 480-668-1917 or check our website for registration information:
www.therapyone.com.

Advertisements

FW: Millan

________________________________________
From: malinda julien [mailto:ustk9@ustk9.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 10:12 PM
To: ‘Scott Royall’
Subject: RE: Millan

100% agreed.. ? My disdain for the stupidity of humans thinking all dogs do
nothing but think about ways to screw them while they are gone instead of
realizing you left an untrained young animal loose in your house makes me
sometimes not so popular.. To use your words "don’t give a flying fig"..
(although my verbalization is much more colorful if not unlady like. ?

________________________________________
From: Scott Royall [mailto:royall@conchbbs.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 9:37 PM
To: ustk9@ustk9.com
Cc: Blaise; Blog; bradgsmith@mdanderson.org; Brandon Milligan; Carol
McKinney; Dianne; DSloan; DVM Marsha Anderson; Jack Davidson;
janis.nicol@nau.edu; John Royall; ‘Michelle Luster’; Ming Zu; Mom; Richard
Becton; Sakina Lanig; Tao Ju
Subject: RE: Millan

Yeah, that’s my reading of him also. When I watch his show, I find myself
thinking, "well duh, stupid human, of course your dog is a psycho. You let
it be the damn pack leader." Obviously, those mean thoughts are directed
toward the owners. Maybe I should’ve been a dog whisperer. Nah, I would’ve
killed half of my clients by now. People just don’t seem to get that dogs
aren’t humans. (Dogs, on the other paw, probably are grateful they’re not!
?) Still, even angelic Lilly has developed the occasional behavioral issue
over the years, most notably garbage trucks and basketballs. No one needed
to tell me how to fix them. For the garbage truck, we simply sat next to one
as it worked its way down a street. The crew might have been a bit spooked
by us, but I didn’t give a flying fig. By the time we reached the end of the
street, Lilly was getting the message crystal clearly. "Yes, those green
things are big and noisy. But, I don’t need to fear them because my human
obviously doesn’t."

In fact, the innate intelligence of dogs is a marvel. Lilly’s lead now hangs
on my wheelchair. That means both her and the chair are controlled normally
only through the joystick. Rarely do I even need to think about Lilly while
she’s in "command mode," because I know she’s intent on following whatever
clues the chair gives her about our next move. ?

________________________________________
From: malinda julien [mailto:ustk9@ustk9.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:27 PM
To: ‘Scott Royall’
Subject: RE: Millan

I think he is a good handler and good at reading dogs. A gift that usually
is NOT going to be able to be repeated by his clients. He is a middle of
the road trainer, some neg some positive and believes in being the "leader"
but not punishing all the time. So, in my book, he is ok.

malinda

________________________________________
From: Scott Royall [mailto:royall@conchbbs.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 6:08 PM
To: Malinda Julien
Subject: Millan

Just curious. What do you think of Caesar Millan?

RE: Millan

Yeah, that’s my reading of him also. When I watch his show, I find myself thinking, “well duh, stupid human, of course your dog is a psycho. You let it be the damn pack leader.” Obviously, those mean thoughts are directed toward the owners. Maybe I should’ve been a dog whisperer. Nah, I would’ve killed half of my clients by now. People just don’t seem to get that dogs aren’t humans. (Dogs, on the other paw, probably are grateful they’re not! J)

Still, even angelic Lilly has developed the occasional behavioral issue over the years, most notably garbage trucks and basketballs. No one needed to tell me how to fix them. For the garbage truck, we simply sat next to one as it worked its way down a street. The crew might have been a bit spooked by us, but I didn’t give a flying fig. By the time we reached the end of the street, Lilly was getting the message crystal clearly. “Yes, those green things are big and noisy. But, I don’t need to fear them because my human obviously doesn’t.”

 In fact, the innate intelligence of dogs is a marvel. Lilly’s lead now hangs on my wheelchair. That means both her and the chair are controlled normally only through the joystick. Rarely do I even need to think about Lilly while she’s in “command mode,” because I know she’s intent on following whatever clues the chair gives her about our next move. J

 

 

 


From: malinda julien [mailto:ustk9@ustk9.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:27 PM
To: ‘Scott Royall’
Subject: RE: Millan

 

I think he is a good handler and good at reading dogs.  A gift that usually is NOT going to be able to be repeated by his clients.  He is a middle of the road trainer, some neg some positive and believes in being the “leader” but not punishing all the time.  So, in my book, he is ok.

 

malinda

 


From: Scott Royall [mailto:royall@conchbbs.com]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 6:08 PM
To: Malinda Julien
Subject: Millan

 

Just curious. What do you think of Caesar Millan?

 

 

 

 

ER: “Body & Soul”

(Welcome to a couple of new members of my blog mailing list. Just let me know if you wish to not receive such email in the future. Also, I apologize for the extreme length of this blog entry, but it drills down to the very core of why I blog.) 

 

ER is a television show very popular on NBC in the US. Like all network shows, it has its own collection of critics—often correct—about its accuracy. Yet, its writers still occasionally manage to hit the core of some medical realities in our society. “Body & Soul” is an episode that aired two weeks ago, drawing heavily upon the situation of Dr. Stephen Hawkins right down to the crappy voice synthesizer run by a manufacturer tech off-camera. J

The episode deals with the realities faced by Dr. Nate Lennox (James Woods), an award-winning microbiologist, and his assistant-cum-caregiver of 25 years, Fran Blevins (Ally Walker). The show starts with the audience seeing Nate out on a crowded ice rink in his wheelchair motoring along oblivious to his surroundings. Nate has ALS, of course, and we soon learn his incoherence is due to low blood oxygenation levels due to pneumonia. He has basically reached another milestone in the progression of his disease where he can no longer breathe on his own. A debate ensues between Fran and some of the ER doctors over whether or not Nate would want a tracheotomy since he is still too disoriented to use his eye-controlled assistive communications device (with the cruddy voice—sorry, that’s a sore point for me) to coherently express his wishes. The pro-tracheotomy faction is led by Dr. Abby Lockhart (Maury Tierny), who seems to be determined to “save” Nate despite Fran’s misgivings. We don’t learn about Abby’s motivation until the end.

 

As the doctors deal with less-invasive procedures and then complications of the tracheotomy, a series of flashbacks show us the other “milestones” of ALS as it slowly kills Nate’s nervous system. In reverse order, we witness the points in his life where assistive communication, a feeding tube, and a power wheelchair become necessary parts of his shrinking world. The flashbacks and dialog also give us some clues about an aspect of disability that very few people even acknowledge, that is the erosion of hope and energy with time. Life is so difficult with a severe disability that it saps the spirit from all members of the household (thus, the episode’s title). Fran started out as Nate’s research assistant, and there was a point where things could’ve turned romantic if ALS hadn’t entered the picture and prompted Nate to rule the opportunity lost.  Yet, she’s still at his side after 25 years, despite her own mental and physical wear, as his primary caregiver. It’s a nice bit of reality when the dialog acknowledges that it’s nearly impossible to keep other caregivers for long. As she puts it, they don’t give the care he needs, and she can’t leave him to that fate. If we had any doubts about her true motives in questioning the tracheotomy, that sad and weary comment silences them. Judging from the experiences of Dr. Hawkins and his wife, the remarks also have the ring of truth. I guess it helps that they knew these brilliant and energetic men before the onset of symptoms, because that gave them memories to keep them going.

 

I’ll wrap up my synopsis of the ER episode like this. Nate does eventually regain his mental clarity, and tells Abby in no uncertain terms that Fran had been correct in her sensing that he wouldn’t have agreed to the trake. He says he’s out of hope, and plans to go home, have one last poker game with friends, and then go to bed without his ventilator so he’ll quietly slip away in his sleep. This is where we learn the reason for Abby’s aggressive approach. Like some of the other doctors, Abby had survived Nate’s first year biology class. However, she stuck it out only because he challenged her with a $10 bet that he could successfully tutor her. This is where Abby reverses the challenge, betting $10 that she could get him past the pneumonia so that he might be able to plateau as Hawkins has and resume teaching. However, if she fails, Abby volunteers to be the one to remove Nate’s vent and ease his departure. I must say that last part seems to impress Nate—and me, frankly—the most, given society’s screwed-up view of assisted suicide.

 

There are differences between me and the fictional Dr. Nate Lennox, of course. Cerebral Palsy isn’t progressive generally. It is essentially a form of brain damage that can occur during pregnancy or birth. Not a great deal more is known about it, however. CP survivors like me who are “lucky” enough to avoid mental impairment simply spend our lives finding ways around our spasticity and lack of fine muscle control.

 

For people like me, the aspect of a severe disability that’s progressive is the financial burden. Those who don’t have a disability in their immediate family tend to believe the various governmental agencies pick up the tab and enable everyone to live at least decent lives. Well, people who believe that are mistaken. I get only $1500 per month, and I am entitled to that much only because I worked 14 years for Shell Oil as an applications developer. I am out of bed for at least 14 hours every day so I have to hire and pay for two caregivers. That alone costs roughly $50,000 annually, plus $8000 in various state and federal taxes. Of that $58,000 burden, roughly $39,000 is reimbursed by a Long Term Care insurance policy I was able to enroll in while with Shell. The rest I have to come up with somehow, and I don’t even pay my people competitively. Saving anything was almost impossible when I was earning $64,000. Not because I was spending wildly, but I had to carry that weight, other medical expenses not covered, and still wanted a few of the nice things my co-workers took for granted.

 

That LTC policy ends 90 days into 2008, and, as things stand now, that will leave Medicare/Medicaid as my only option. Medicare supposedly can pay for individual caregivers, but they do so only several months after each invoice. I don’t know of any caregivers rich enough to afford that. Instead, Medicare will disregard the fact that I own my own home and aging van, and ship me off to a Medicare-funded nursing home because I need assistance with the five ADLs. I’ve had several caregivers who have worked in those places and their advice is unanimous: I need to avoid those places like Ebola. Fran Blevin’s remarks apply to nursing homes funded by Medicare in spades. They are under-funded, and so they’re under-staffed by under-motivated people. Care there is minimal at best.

 

It is true that I am able to do some things people find amazing. In that narrow context, I suppose the politically-correct “differently-abled” has some validity. However, that’s only true when important technology works and I’m at least near enough to the laptop. If something breaks or I’m not in my chair, I’m in the state Dr. Nate Lennox feared the most would be his fate: a functioning mind locked away in a useless body. I too refuse to go there. That’s an end inappropriate for any semi-intelligent animal. The technologies that enable me to function do require support and repair. That is currently provided by one of my caregivers, a friend, and—a little indirectly—by Dell. I wouldn’t have that support infrastructure in a nursing home environment. Depending on what malfunctions, I might not be able to summon support. It’s certain those under-paid, overworked caregivers won’t.

 

People get very hinky when I calmly discuss suicide as a possible alternative to wasting away in a nursing home, because they think I’m somehow trying to manipulate them. That’s a pity, because drawing that conclusion causes them to overlook the real point. I inherently need for people to know my story.  Of course I hope to leave behind something more tangible and useful, such as a descendant of Xpress It on maybe a tablet PC. Yet, that hope fades with each passing day. If my perspectives of how I am affected by events playing out with and around me are to be my only legacy, I have to record and archive them. That’s the most fundamental reason why I created this blog. As a fiscal and social conservative, I firmly believe public awareness and scrutiny will ultimately be more effective in improving treatment of the disabled and other minorities than all the laws in the universe. After all, we are all members of one minority or another. How many times must I endure recruiters telling me that my resume indicates that I’m perfect for a position only to have them completely disappear or decline to interview me as soon as they learn I’m disabled before the discrimination becomes too obvious to deny? Those are the types of experience I need to capture along with other things like the bureaucratic idiocy of the IRS if conditions are ever going to improve for future generations.

 

The best analogy I can give you is that of water. Water molecules comprise the second lightest element we know of, meaning that the amount of influence an individual molecule can exert on its surroundings is virtually nil. Yet, just ask any survivor of the 2004 tsunami how powerful those same molecules become when they start moving in the same general direction and bumping into each other. Humans function on the same principle in most cases.

 

Incidentally, the tech who actually ran the communications rig seen on ER says it sells for $7500-10,000. Yeah, right. Is it any wonder why the thought of lowering Xpress It’s price from $850 galls me?

 

You can read the rest of my blog here.

 

 

RE: FW: AT&T Natural Voice

Exactly.

 

________________________________________
From: DSloan [mailto:djsloan25a26@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:11 AM
To: Scott Royall
Subject: Re: FW: AT&T Natural Voice

Scott ..
  Roadblock, roadblock, roadblock .. I wish I had the machine to dig the
tunnel to go under the damn things.  djs

Scott Royall <royall@conchbbs.com> wrote:

The problem there is that Hawkins can only control one finger. That means he
requires a solution involving scanning keys until the desired one comes up.
Hawkins then trips a switch to tell the computer that’s the key he wants.
Ironically, XP comes with a primitive version of such virtual keyboard
software. More functional versions are also available. Like most WinApps,
Xpress It is totally apathetic about the real source of its input so it
should work well with scanning solutions.

Frankly though, even if I knew how to contact Dr. Hawkins, it’s highly
doubtful that he would even agree to try a different answer. The TRC
regional director for adaptive equipment warned Ming and I back when we
first started our marketing efforts that very few disabled people venture
beyond the first AAC they’re exposed to. That explains why Hawkins sounds as
if he’s still using a DECTalk, which is 1980 technology. That is also why
I’d really like to see school children with Xpress It.

 

________________________________________
From: DSloan [mailto:djsloan25a26@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:08 PM
To: Scott Royall
Subject: Re: AT&T Natural Voice

Scott ..
  One wonders if Hawking would try / endorse your product … djs

Scott Royall wrote:
Here’s another little puzzlement: AT&T sells many flavors of its Natural
Voice in Software Development Kits. Each kit is $295. That’s right, neither

==========================================
DJSloan .. Houston, Texas
djsloan25a26@yahoo.com
Reference:

==========================================
DJSloan .. Houston, Texas
djsloan25a26@yahoo.com
Reference:

FW: AT&T Natural Voice

The problem there is that Hawkins can only control one finger. That means he
requires a solution involving scanning keys until the desired one comes up.
Hawkins then trips a switch to tell the computer that’s the key he wants.
Ironically, XP comes with a primitive version of such virtual keyboard
software. More functional versions are also available. Like most WinApps,
Xpress It is totally apathetic about the real source of its input so it
should work well with scanning solutions.

Frankly though, even if I knew how to contact Dr. Hawkins, it’s highly
doubtful that he would even agree to try a different answer. The TRC
regional director for adaptive equipment warned Ming and I back when we
first started our marketing efforts that very few disabled people venture
beyond the first AAC they’re exposed to. That explains why Hawkins sounds as
if he’s still using a DECTalk, which is 1980 technology. That is also why
I’d really like to see school children with Xpress It.

 

________________________________________
From: DSloan [mailto:djsloan25a26@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:08 PM
To: Scott Royall
Subject: Re: AT&T Natural Voice

Scott ..
  One wonders if Hawking would try / endorse your product … djs

Scott Royall <royall@conchbbs.com> wrote:
Here’s another little puzzlement: AT&T sells many flavors of its Natural
Voice in Software Development Kits. Each kit is $295. That’s right, neither

==========================================
DJSloan .. Houston, Texas
djsloan25a26@yahoo.com
Reference:

AT&T Natural Voice

Here’s another little puzzlement: AT&T sells many flavors of its Natural
Voice in Software Development Kits. Each kit is $295. That’s right, neither
programmer nor end user is able to customize the voice itself. They must
select from whatever voices AT&T offers. No doubt that’s one reason why
their voices sound so good. Yet, that lack of customization also means the
voices can’t be personalized. That probably seems a small price to pay to
most people. most people, however, aren’t disabled.

I’ve noticed that even healthcare professionals have a great deal of
difficulty grasping the concept that any device a disabled person uses to
interact with the world around him eventually becomes a logical part of his
own body. Those devices become very personal so it’s important that they be
customizable. Who wants to sound just like everyone else that uses similar
software?

On a related note, Words+ reports to be Dr. Stephen Hawkins’ vendor. Well
doctor, I submit respectfully that there are other solutions that could
improve your intelligibility. Just for comparison, Xpress It’s Eloquence
allows its end users to be anyone from a tiny child to a dirty old man (or
woman).